Govt Allows Civil Servants To Choose Between OPS, NPS Till November 30, Which One Should You Pick?

In a significant development, the Union government has granted civil servants a golden opportunity to opt for the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) until November 30.

This one-time option comes following representations from the All India Service (AIS) members, comprising the Indian Administrative Service, Indian Police Service, and the Indian Forest Service.

With this window of choice now open, let’s explore the key differences between the OPS and the National Pension System (NPS) and which one the employees should choose.

OLD PENSION SCHEME: A TIME-TESTED SECURITY BLANKET

The OPS has been the bedrock of financial security for government employees for decades. Before the advent of the NPS in 2004, OPS offered a defined benefit pension system, ensuring a fixed amount of pension based on years of service and the last drawn salary. The predictability and stability of OPS made it an attractive choice for employees seeking long-term financial security.
KEY FEATURES OF OPS

Defined Benefit (DB) Pension: Employees are entitled to a guaranteed pension amount based on their years of service and average salary during the last years of employment. This predictable payout provides peace of mind during retirement.

Family Pension: In the event of the employee’s demise, the family is entitled to a family pension, thus ensuring financial support for surviving dependents.

Commuted Pension: Under OPS, employees can commute a part of their pension as lump sum at the time of retirement, thus offering immediate financial flexibility.

NPS: A PARADIGM Shift In Retirement Planning

The government introduced NPS to address the evolving needs of pension management and to move towards a more sustainable and market-linked system. Unlike OPS, NPS operates on a defined contribution basis, empowering employees to actively manage their pension corpus and invest in a range of asset classes.

KEY FEATURES OF NPS

Defined Contribution (DC) Pension: Under NPS, both the employee and the employer contribute to the pension account, thus creating a corpus that is invested in various financial instruments. The eventual pension amount depends on the returns generated by these investments.
Choice Of Investment: Employees have the flexibility to choose from multiple pension fund managers and investment options, including equity, debt, and government securities. This allows them to align their investments with their risk appetite and financial goals.

Portability: NPS offers the advantage of portability, thus enabling employees to transfer their NPS account across employers and locations without losing accumulated benefits.

MAKING THE RIGHT CHOICE: FACTORS TO CONSIDER

Choosing between the time-tested OPS and the new NPS can be a critical decision. These are the following factors that should be kept in mind in order to make an informed choice.

Risk Tolerance: OPS provides a stable and secure pension, while NPS introduces an element of market risk. Thus, one should assess one’s risk tolerance and investment preferences before deciding on which to choose.

Longevity: If you anticipate a longer life expectancy, NPS may offer the potential for higher returns over the long term. OPS, on the other hand, guarantees a fixed pension regardless of market fluctuations.

Investment Expertise: NPS requires active involvement in managing investments. Thus, evaluate your financial literacy and willingness to monitor and adjust investment choices periodically.

As the November 30 deadline approaches, employees will now have a unique chance to shape their financial future. The OPS ensures stability and predictability, while the NPS opens doors to market-linked growth.  

One should analyse one’s individual circumstances, risk appetite, and retirement aspirations carefully before deciding which one to choose between these two.